The Debate Between Rawls And Nozick - 1125 Words

Jenia Bello Justice Paper #1 The debate between Rawls and Nozick is one that can still be seen today. The solution to the problem depends on whether a person is a libertarian or a liberal. Though Rawls makes a compelling argument, Nozick’s words cannot be ignored. Rawls argument claims that justice should be fair and this fairness is achieved by strong government restraints. Rawls believes that justice should be able to be achieved by all, not only the privileged. Nozick claims that justice comes from a minimal state, one where people can achieve justice through their natural rights. Justice is redistributive; it is not solely in the hands of one person. There is a clear debate and the obvious choice is Nozick solely based on the fact that Rawls’ theory is an impractical one. In order for Rawls theory to be put into effect there needs to be no self-interest. This is not the case with human nature; society is naturally inclined to protect the self. Rawls claims that if people did not know t heir place in society they would follow through with his theory and eradicate all so called injustices that lead to an uneven distribution of wealth. Human beings will always pick the option, which allows them to have to largest possible gains, not one where everyone is on an even playing field. Beings would not place themselves in the lowest of the low; they wouldn’t assume themselves to be â€Å"those in need†. Competition seems to be completely ignored by Rawls, we are driven byShow MoreRelatedLiberalism And The Ethical And Logical Level Essay1332 Words   |  6 Pagesmovements. We will be discussing the theories of some liberal authors such as John Rawls, Locke, Mill, Nozick, and Waldron among others whose philosophies clash on the ethical and logical level. We will discuss the following proposal; ‘’the government can no more act†¦ to advance human excellence, or the values of perfection†¦ than it can to advance Catholicism or Protestantism, or any other religion’ (John Rawls). We will then attempt to answer the following questions; why do so many liberals thinkRead MoreCarbon Taxing : Moving Towards An Efficient Economy2418 Words   |  10 Pagesefficiency. ANALYSIS Rawls Versus Nozick John Rawls and Robert Nozick, two of the most influential scholars of the 20th century in the great debate about Justice, have highly contradicting reviews. The justice we are talking about is not the legal justice or justice in terms of power, here we focus on justice in terms of distribution of resources in the society among the people in that society, or simply put, Distributive Justice. According to Rawls, in his book, â€Å"A Theory of Justice†Read MoreThe Libertarian Philosophy That Robert Nozick Advocates1943 Words   |  8 PagesThe Libertarian Philosophy that Robert Nozick advocates in his seminal works Anarchy, State and Utopia delves deeply into the concepts of distributive justice and equality we, humanity, are entitled to. Nozick emphasises the effectiveness of the minimal state as a political system that is successful in ensuring the traditional libertarian view of negative liberty that secures what Nozick believes to be our inalienable rights. Quite clearly Nozick is a supporter of minimal interference from a governingRead MoreEssay about Principle of Fairness in Political Obligations6563 Words   |  27 Pagesjustifications of one’s political obligations, most of which stem from the transactional relationships intrinsic to organized societies. These transactional accounts assert that political obligations are acquired through morally imbued relationships between the citizen and his compatriots, or the citizen and the state. One such theory is the â€Å"principle of fair play† (sometimes referred to as the â€Å"principle of fairness†).1 Very simply put, authors of this principle argue that promises and deliberate consentRead MoreQuestions On The Theories Of Justice2659 Words   |  11 Pagesof utilitarian logic, John Rawls seeks to develop a theory of justice that demonstrates similar strengths of utilitarianism while avoiding its obvious weaknesses. For Rawls, the theory that would consider the well being of the individual person while also maintaining a method for making essential decisions about distributive justice was called, â€Å"justice as fairness.† Through utilizing the social contract theories of Locke and Rousseau, and the deontology of Kant, Rawls develops a theory that bridgesRead MoreConcept of Freedom in Political Theory1679 Words   |  7 Pageswant. In contrast, negative freedom can be considered ‘free-dom from’, in terms of absence of restrictions on individual behaviour. The idea of negative freedom has been criticised as it does not take into account the difference in circumstances between individuals. One may be free to take a cruise in the sense that it is open to all, but only people who can afford it can be considered to have a real choice and thus freedom. Through such argu-ments is the concept of equality linked with freedom.Read MoreEssay about Hegel and The Libertarians2958 Words   |  12 PagesABSTRACT: This paper aims to show how the Hegelian philosophy can contribute to the conceptual discussions between the two strains of contemporary ethical-political philosophy. I argue that the Hegeli an political theory is of central import to the discussion between communitarians and libertarians, both in the communitarian criticism of the libertarian — mainly in Michael Sandels criticism of Rawls — and in the Rawlsian project of a society founded in justice as equality. For if the communitarians theoreticalRead More Amartya Sens What is Equality? Essays3903 Words   |  16 PagesI take up the What is equality? controversy begun by Amartya Sen in 1979 by critically considering utility (J. S. Mill), primary goods (John Rawls), property rights (John Roemer) and basic capabilities in terms of what is to be distributed according to principles and theories of social justice. I then consider the four most general principles designed to answer issues raised by the Equality of Welfare principle, Equality of Opportunity for Welfare principle, Equality of Resources principle andRead MoreIs the Study of Politics Best Considered a Science or an Art?1733 Words   |  7 Page sIs the study of politics best considered a science or an art? Since its conception as a formal academic discipline, Politics has existed on the fault line between two great fields of enquiry, the sciences and the arts. During the mid 20th century, with the rise of the behavioural movement, a general trend towards the â€Å"scientification† of the study of politics could be observed. The origins of this movement can be traced back to the logical positivism of the Vienna Circle and the writings of AugusteRead MoreWhy We Should Legalize Prostitution1843 Words   |  8 Pagesthe general public, economy, and the welfare of society. In addition, portray some views from profound philosophers ( John Rawls, and Robert Nozick) which in my research, see to promote the legislation of prostitution. I will also address a number of arguments against the legality of prostitution that include issues of sex trafficking increases. Since the mid 1980’s the debate about prostitution has been persistent, but has never been in popular demand.Millions of women and girls around the world